Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kerri Christopher's avatar

Still mulling over medieval vs post-Enlightenment Christianity and the approach to work that flows from it, or perhaps rather from its approach to the world. The former is primarily receptive; the latter is primarily that of domination (man vs nature, via machine). I think reading enough original sources also would show that these are distinctly tied to Catholic vs Protestant ways of seeing the world, at least in so far as the theology is built on (or not built on) certain philosophies.

(I realize that’s a lot to say in one comment :) but it’s something I’ve been reflecting on lately… someday it may turn into an essay but I have a few others in the queue that need attention first!)

Expand full comment
Lauren Flanagan's avatar

Okay, I'm rereading Wuthering Heights now and it's one of my favorite books so I feel I've got to do some defending 😆 This is a long excerpt from Virginia Woolf's essay "Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights" but it really encapsulates part of why I love WH so much (it's worth reading, I promise!):

Wuthering Heights is a more difficult book to understand than Jane Eyre, because Emily was a greater poet than Charlotte. When Charlotte wrote she said with eloquence and splendour and passion “I love, ” “I hate,” “I suffer.” Her experience, though more intense, is on a level with our own.

But there is no “I” in Wuthering Heights. There are no governesses. There are no employers. There is love, but it is not the love of men and women. Emily was inspired by some more general conception.

The impulse which urged her to create was not her own suffering or her own injuries. She looked out upon a world cleft into gigantic disorder and felt within her the power to unite it in a book.

That gigantic ambition is to be felt throughout the novel — a struggle, half thwarted but of superb conviction, to say something through the mouths of her characters which is not merely “I love” or “I hate,” but “we, the whole human race ” and “you, the eternal powers . . .” the sentence remains unfinished. It is not strange that it should be so; rather it is astonishing that she can make us feel what she had it in her to say at all.

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts